You'll find me today at the Writers Who Kill blog, talking about teaching writing at workshops and conferences and what makes a good student and helps in learning.
http://writerswhokill.blogspot.com/2013/07/workshops-and-conferences.html
Monday, July 8, 2013
Friday, July 5, 2013
The Morning After—4th of July Rant
The fools next door, across the street, and all the way down
the block on both sides were bursting cherry bombs, M80s, bottle rockets, and
handguns until long after 1:30 a.m. This morning, they greeted 7:30 a.m. with a
handful of cherry bombs and several strings of firecrackers, just to start the
day off right. It’s a good thing I’m a believer in gun control and own no
semi-automatic weapon, or I might surely have committed a grave crime indeed
and left the world and my neighborhood a better place for it.
Kansas City is the second biggest fireworks market after San
Antonio, although all unlicensed private fireworks displays in the city limits (and
most of the suburbs) are illegal. Fourth of July here is absolutely miserable
for dogs, cats, and sane people. I remember one year when my husband and I were
returning from a trip late on Fourth of July and the city’s skyline looked like
a war zone, clouded in the smoke of battle and explosions. Kansas City offers
many legal, lavish, and free public fireworks displays, but folks will insist
on spending hundreds of dollars at the fireworks stands set up just outside the
city and suburban limits to blast away in their own front yards and the streets
outside their homes.
Every year homes burn, often to the ground, and people,
often children, end up in the emergency room with major injuries from
fireworks. But still, the fools buy them and set them off (while drunk) on
every street in the large, sprawling metropolitan area, usually with a passel
of kids running around among the minor explosives, leaving tons of fireworks
trash all over the sidewalks and streets for someone else to clean up. Fourth
of July is dreaded by firemen, police, EMTs, and sane people who’ve retained
their hearing because of what the illegal and stupid use of fireworks brings.
I love celebrations, and picnics, family gatherings,
barbecues, cookouts, and block parties are wonderful ways to celebrate
Independence Day. There are ceremonies that honor servicemen and others who
have served their communities and ceremonies where speakers and politicians
recount our history (albeit whitewashed) as a country, praise the wisdom and
courage of our forefathers, and speak to the importance of honoring our country’s
ideals today. And often there are spectacular, legal, public fireworks displays
put on by professionals using all the safeguards that have been developed
through the years. Why can’t people settle for one or all of these ways to
celebrate and leave the illegal fireworks alone?
And why, oh why must they start with the illegal fireworks
in late June and run with them until the 8th or 10th of
July? How are we celebrating the foundation of a nation of based on law when we
break the law in front of our kids and encourage them to do the same? What kind
of example are we setting when we do something like that? On the Fourth of July,
we turn into a nation of scofflaws—and the most unpleasant of neighbors
I know I’m not the only one who hates this idiocy. My Twitter
and Facebook feeds last night were both full of friends all over the country
complaining about the idiots near them who were blasting away and the damage
this was doing to their hearing, their nerves, and their animals. The police
can’t arrest a whole city, even when the citizens are openly breaking the law.
It’s a logistical nightmare. Laws and the civil society that they make possible
only work when most of the citizens of a place will abide by them. As we become
more lawless in this way, doesn’t it make it easier for that slide into
lawlessness as a society that everyone worries about?
The best Fourth of July I ever spent was in Oxford, England.
No one over there even knows the day is different, and Britain certainly doesn’t
celebrate the occasion of losing its top colony. Next year, I think I’m going
to have to spend Fourth of July in some other country to avoid the cretins who
are wrecking it in this one.
How do you feel about all the illegal private fireworks on
Fourth of July?
Thursday, June 27, 2013
Interview Anxiety (at Stiletto Gang)
I'm at The Stiletto Gang today, talking about being sandbagged in a TV interview and tricked into a porn infomercial and how that's left me with "Interview Anxiety."
http://thestilettogang.blogspot.com/2013/06/interview-anxiety.html
http://thestilettogang.blogspot.com/2013/06/interview-anxiety.html
Tuesday, June 25, 2013
Buenos Aires in Tumult--Guest Blog by Annamaria Alfieri
Buenos Aires in Tumult by Annamaria Alfieri
Blood Tango,
my third South American historical mystery, takes place in Buenos Aires in
1945, during the most dramatic week in Argentine history. Argentines had been protesting in the streets
of their capital for more than twenty months, and by October of that year the
demonstrations were reaching new heights and threatening chaos. Think Turkey and Brazil during the past few
weeks.
The country was being ruled by a military junta, and the populace
both of the left and the right were demanding rule by constitutional law. Sound
familiar?
On the 8th of October Colonel Juan Domingo PerĂ³n celebrated his
fiftieth birthday. He was the most
powerful man in the country--its vice president, minister of war, and secretary
of labor, as well as the puppet master pulling the strings of the
president--General Edelmiro Farrell. As the most visible symbol of army rule,
PerĂ³n was also the most hated of Argentines.
On the day after his birthday, the generals deposed him in the
hopes of quelling the mobs who are shouting for democracy in the plazas. But
the demands for a return to the constitution continued apace.
When, the junta went a step further and put PerĂ³n in jail, his
supporters—the lowest level workers in the land—joined in with manifestations
of their own, ratcheting up the noise and the stakes. The sheer numbers of PerĂ³n’s supporters were
a game changer. Eventually hundreds of
thousands of them took to the avenidas
to make their own demand. They had only
one. They wanted PerĂ³n back in power.
Who were these men—individually powerless who combined to become
an irresistible political force?
Until the late 19th and early 20th
centuries, the citizens of Buenos Aires had almost nothing in common with the
people living in the rest of Argentina.
The porteños (people of the port) were white—the original Spaniards, more
recently joined by Europeans of all sorts who streamed into BA, much as they did
into New York or Boston. They built a
city very like the ones they had left behind across the ocean. They sold the beef raised out on the Pampas
back to Europe, notable to England, and they shopped it on the hoof.
The invention of refrigeration changed all that. Meat could be shipped already packaged. Slaughter houses (owned by Brits and Americans)
were built next to the stockyards south of Buenos Aires and staffed with South
American Indian men who poured into the city from the plains in search of jobs.
The oligarchic upper classes of the “Paris of the South” bought
their labor cheap and ignored their needs, thereby creating fertile ground for
the ambitious Colonel PerĂ³n. As
secretary of labor, he had taken up the workers’ cause and made sure of their
allegiance by enforcing statutory wage raises, vacations, and health insurance.
The low level workers owed all their gains to PerĂ³n, and when
their man was sent to jail, they decided that if the upper classes could
demonstrate for their rights, so could they.
A week after PerĂ³n said farewell to his powerful position, they showed
up by their hundreds of thousands to demand his return. Blood
Tango is set against this background, and the story of PerĂ³n’s fall and
struggle to return to power constitutes a subplot that reads like a political
thriller.
The fictitious murder plot involves the stabbing of an Evita
lookalike. The people in power fear that
Evita Duarte, a very popular soap opera actress who is PerĂ³n’s mistress, will
stir up trouble among the poorest citizens of Buenos Aires. Many people might have wanted to kill Evita
to keep her from filling such a role. Blood Tango takes up the question
through the killing of a girl who could have been mistaken for Evita. Was the crime one of politics or
passion?
The book launches this week.
You can read more about it at www.annaamariaalfieri.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


.jpg)

