I’ve read a lot of lists of rules for mystery writers.
Everyone wants to tell us what to do, but I’ve discovered by reading through
these lists that large swathes of them are either misguided or simply false. So
this is my set of casual guidelines for mystery writing—to steer you in the
right direction but also to remind you to think for yourself.
The plot is not everything in mysteries, as so many
of these lists of rules say. Just having a lot of action or clues and red
herrings doesn’t make a good crime novel. The best plots rise out of character.
Dive deep into your major characters and discover their motivations and their
secrets. Your best plot with all its twists and turns will come from the fears,
desires, and manipulations of your characters and how many of them are at
cross-purposes with each other.
Introduce both the protagonist and the antagonist early on.
This is important—for any novel. The reader needs to know with whom to
identify and who is threatening whatever that protagonist with whom he identifies
is trying to achieve.
The crime needs to be a major crime, preferably murder, but
there have been successful mysteries written around art heists, con schemes,
and other crimes. In Gaudy Night,
Dorothy Sayers even wrote one of the classic novels in which only anonymous
letters and vandalism occur. You must simply be able to make it of absolute
importance to the protagonist and to the reader. Murder is not required—it’s
just easier.
The crime and its solution should seem believable. The
reader must be able to believe that the antagonist could commit whatever
heinous crime you’ve given him and that the protagonist could solve it and
overcome him. Physically, intellectually, and emotionally, the crime must seem
possible to the reader without giving either the villain or the hero
superpowers.
And as a corollary to this—you must motivate your villain.
Because he or she is pure evil or stark raving mad is not a good reason to
break major societal taboos and put himself or herself in danger of life in
prison or the death penalty. As much as you motivate your other characters to
make them believable, so much must you motivate your antagonist to make a
credible threat. The more complex and motivated the villain, the more memorable
and fascinating.
One of these rule lists sets as an adamant, must-obey rule
that your narrator or detective must never commit the crime. Hello? Does anyone
remember a little-known writer like Agatha Christie who violated that rule in
three different, very successful books? If you want to make your narrator or
detective commit the crime, you will have to be fiendishly clever to pull it
off, but if you are and can, go for it!
One of the rules in almost every list that I will agree with
is the admonition to do your research. I know a writer who came from another
genre to mystery and doesn’t like research so he makes things up. That will
come back to haunt you in mysteries. Mystery readers expect and demand good
research so that they can stay in the fictive dream. They will chastise you in a
minute (and rightly so) if they catch you in a factual error—and there is
always someone, and usually more than one, who will catch you. On the other
hand, they reward those who research and use it well with great loyalty. Do
your research and learn how to use it so it doesn’t stop or slow the story.
So, these are my casual guidelines for mystery writers.
Nothing is written in stone. Every writer is a different situation. Some may
even be able to introduce protagonist and/or antagonist over halfway through
the book. I know I couldn’t, but that doesn’t mean you can’t. It’s just much
easier to keep your reader’s interest, however, if you introduce them both in
the first few chapters. Every other guideline I’ve given is the same. Perhaps
you are so brilliant at making things up that no one will ever question your
lack of research. I wouldn’t count on it, but it’s always possible. Use these as guidelines for your own
judgment. Ultimately, it’s your book. You are the creator and need to do it
your own way. Just make sure that your readers will follow you along your book
path.
Thanks. This looks like a better guide than many I have read.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Alan. It seems just common sense to me, but I've been doing it for quite a while. :-)
ReplyDeleteThank you, Linda. I'd like to copy this for my own use unless you object.
ReplyDeleteNot at all, Reine. Go ahead if it's just for your own use.
ReplyDeleteWhy would I introduce the antagonist/murderer early on? Isn't he supposed to be a mystery for the detective to uncover over time using clues?
ReplyDeleteYou don't let the reader know who the antagonist/murderer is, but s/he must be one of the characters you introduced early on. If you pull in some stranger at the end of the book as the murderer, the reader will be dissatisfied, if not furious--and rightly so.
DeleteVery creatiive post
ReplyDelete